- Visibility 41 Views
- Downloads 6 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijpo.2022.050
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Algorithmic approach of immunohistochemistry in metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary site
- Author Details:
-
Banushree C S*
Introduction
Cancers of unknown primary site (CUPs) are histologically confirmed diverse group of metastatic cancers for which primary tumor site cannot be identified after extensive multidisciplinary investigations.[1] At present, along with IHC and molecular assay, genetic profiling is guiding the clinicians to diagnose and initiate individualised therapy to the patient with CUPs.[2] A step-wise histopathological diagnosis based on morphology followed by application of IHC is to exclude the treatable malignancy like lymphoma, sarcoma and melanoma and also to further confirm the diagnosis of carcinoma.[3] So the basic panel of IHC which include pancytokeratin, Vimentin, LCA, S-100, Melan-A and GFAP.[4]
Cytokeratins are intermediate filament proteins expressed in epithelial cells. There are around 54 functional keratin genes. Low molecular weight (LBW) keratins (CK8 and CK18) positivity is seen in adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. High molecular weight keratins (CK5 & CK14) are helpful to confirm squamous cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. CK7 and CK20 have been most widely used to detect the primary site of the tumor. The CK7 is expressed by simple epithelia like lung pneumocytes and breast acinar epithelium. The CK20 is limited to the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract, especially colorectum, the urothelial umbrella cells, and Merkel cells of the epidermis. This has been useful in the identification of the primary site of carcinomas. A broad-spectrum cytokeratin cocktail (AE1/3 and CAM 5.2), CK7, CK20 along with organ-specific markers should be used in the initial panel ([Table 1]).[5], [6], [3]
The sub-classification of carcinoma is gaining importance due to the recent advances in the targeted therapy. It is difficult to subclassify based on morphology on routine haematoxylin and eosin stained sections. At the same time, use of numerous markers in aiding the diagnosis can increase the burden on the patient. A wide range of carcinoma can be positive for CK7 and negative for CK20. A various number of organ-specific markers are available with varying sensitivity and specificity. In view of common site of origin of CUPs, the markers like TTF-1, GATA3, PAX8, WT1 can be used in CK7 positive carcinoma.[7] CK20 positivity can be seen in co; orectal carcinoma which can be further confirmed by CDX-2.[8] The diffuse or focal CK7+ and CK20+ is seen in urinary bladder carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma of ovary and lung, pancreatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, small intestinal carcinoma and NUT carcinoma.[9] Many of the CUPs can be CK7 and CK20 negative and few of the carcinoma which commonly present as both CK7 and CK20 negative are prostatic, renal, hepatic, adrenocortical and germ cell tumors.[5]
CK7+/CK20− |
CK7+/CK20+ |
CK7−/CK20+ |
CK7−/CK20− |
Breast carcinoma |
Urothelial carcinoma |
Colorectal adenocarcinoma |
Prostate adenocarcinoma |
Lung adenocarcinoma |
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
||
Merkel cell carcinoma |
Renal (clear cells) Carcinoma |
||
Endometrial |
|||
Adenocarcinoma |
Ovarian mucinous carcinoma |
Gastric adenocarcinoma |
|
Hepatocellular carcinoma |
|||
Endocervical |
|||
Adenocarcinoma |
Bladder adenocarcinoma |
|
Adrenocortical carcinoma |
Ovarian (serous) ca |
|||
Non-seminoma germ cell tumours |
|||
Cholangiocarcinoma |
Gastric adenocarcinoma |
||
Mesothelioma |
|||
Small cell lung ca |
Cholangiocarcinoma |
Small cell lung carcinoma |
|
Mesothelioma |
|
Gastric adenocarcinoma |
|
Thyroid carcinoma |
|||
Salivary gland tumours |
|||
|
|||
Kidney (papillary) |
|||
Urothelial ca(subset) |
|||
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma |
|||
Gastric adenocarcinoma |
Conclusion
CUPs are the diverse group of metastatic carcinomas for which subclassification is difficult on morphology. Application of immunohistochemistry in a step-wise manner can help to detect the origin of tumor tissue. The sub-classification is very important in the era of targeted therapy which indeed can improve the survival rate of cancer patients. Immunohistochemistry is a composite diagnostic procedure, where each step is important for final results. Interpretation should be done after analysing the pitfalls, morphology and clinical information.
References
- MA Benderra, M Ilie, P Hofman, C Massard. Standard of care of carcinomas on cancer of unknown primary site in 2016. Bull Cancer 2016. [Google Scholar]
- RV Gauri, NR Martin. Cancer of Unknown Primary Site. N Engl J Med 2014. [Google Scholar]
- P Chu, E Wu, LM Weiss. Cytokeratin 7 and cytokeratin 20 expression in epithelial neoplasms: a survey of 435 cases. Mod Pathol 2000. [Google Scholar]
- A Conway, C Mitchell, E Kilgour, G Brady, C Dive, N Cook. Molecular characterisation and liquid biomarkers in Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (CUP): taking the ‘U’ out of ‘CUP’. Br J Cancer 2019. [Google Scholar]
- F Lin, H Liu. Immunohistochemistry in Undifferentiated Neoplasm/Tumor of Uncertain Origin. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2014. [Google Scholar]
- PL Kandalaft, AM Gown. Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016. [Google Scholar]
- GT Gurda, L Zhang, Y Wang, L Chen, S Geddes, WC Cho. Utility of five commonly used immunohistochemical markers TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, CK5/6 and P63 in primary and metastatic adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study of 246 fine needle aspiration cases. Clin Transl Med 2015. [Google Scholar]
- M Barbareschi, B Murer, TV Colby, M Chilosi, E Macri, M Loda. CDX-2 homeobox gene expression is a reliable marker of colorectal adenocarcinoma metastases to the lungs. Am J Surg Pathol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- J Selves, E Long-Mira, MC Mathieu, P Rochaix, M Ilié. Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosis of Metastatic Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site. Cancers 2018. [Google Scholar]