- Visibility 278 Views
- Downloads 27 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/2394-6792.2018.0126
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears – A double blind study
- Author Details:
-
Savitri M Nerune *
-
Mahmood Nawaz Khan
-
R M Potekar
-
Vijayalaxmi Patil
Objective: Fixation in cytology is to preserve and maintain clear and consistent morphological features. Ethanol is most commonly used a gold standard fixative in cytology, but it has few disadvantages such as expensive, flammable, evaporates easily, subjected to pilferage and not easily available. So honey can be used as fixative as it contains several minerals, trace elements, vitamins, carbohydrates and acts as a fixative because of its inherent properties by enabling cellular preservation and dehydration. Considering this objective of present study is to evaluate the fixative properties of honey in comparison with ethanol in a double blinded manner.
Materials and Methods: Two oral smears were obtained from each individual (n=50) by gently scraping the buccal mucosa. One slide was fixed in ethanol (95%) and the other in honey (20% processed) for a minimum of 15 minutes and stained with Papanicolaou stain. Two separate pathologists who were blinded for the fixative used evaluated the slides for 5 parameters (Cell morphology, Nuclear and Cytoplasmic staining, Clarity and uniformity of staining,).
Results: Among 50 cases evaluated by both pathologists, results showed that honey fixed smears had acceptable nuclear and cytoplasmic staining, well preserved cell morphology, clarity and uniformity of staining as comparable to ethanol with no statistical difference between both fixatives.
Conclusion: Hence in search of a better, eco-friendly and cost effective fixative, 20% processed honey can be efficiently used in cytological smear fixation for the preservation of cellular details.
Keywords: Buccal smear, Ethanol, Fixation.
References
- Jindal S, Chauhan I, Grewal HK. Alteration in buccal mucosal cells due to the effect of tobacco and alcohol by assessing the silver-stained nucleolar organiser regions and micronuclei. Journal of Cytology. 2013;30(3):174.
- Sloan P, Bocking A. Oral cavity. In Gray W, Kocjan G. Diagnostic Cytopathology E-Book: Expert Consult: Online and Print. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010;24:253-
- McCarthy J. antibacterial effects of honey: medical fact or fiction?. American Bee Journal. 1995:171-2.
- Molan PC. Why honey is effective as a medicine. 1. Its use in modern medicine. Bee world. 1999;80(2):80-92.
- Singh A, Hunasgi S, Koneru A, Vanishree M, Ramalu S, Manvikar V. Comparison of honey with ethanol as an oral cytological fixative: A pilot study. Journal of cytology. 2015;32(2):113.
- Ishaq R, Azmat H, Omair M, Sheikh AK, Tanwani AK. Comparison of Honey With Alcohol As A Fixative In Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology. International Journal of Pathology. 2017;15(1):15-8.
- Özkan N, Şalva E, Cakalağaoğlu F, Tüzüner B. Honey as a substitute for formalin?. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2012;87(2):148-53.
- Patil S, Rao RS, Ganavi BS, Majumdar B. Natural sweeteners as fixatives in histopathology: A longitudinal study. Journal of natural science, biology, and medicine. 2015;6(1):67.
- Majumdar B, Rao R, Patil S. Tissue Preservation with Natural Fixatives: An Immunohistochemical Evaluation. World Journal of Dentistry. 2016;7:87-91.
- Gunter M, Bryant P. Immunocytochemical evaluation of ductal carcinoma in breast after preservation in honey. Journal of Histotechnology. 2009;32(2):54-9.
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Nerune SM, Khan MN, Potekar RM, Patil V. Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears – A double blind study [Internet]. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2018 [cited 2025 Oct 14];5(4):663-666. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-6792.2018.0126
APA
Nerune, S. M., Khan, M. N., Potekar, R. M., Patil, V. (2018). Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears – A double blind study. Indian J Pathol Oncol, 5(4), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-6792.2018.0126
MLA
Nerune, Savitri M, Khan, Mahmood Nawaz, Potekar, R M, Patil, Vijayalaxmi. "Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears – A double blind study." Indian J Pathol Oncol, vol. 5, no. 4, 2018, pp. 663-666. https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-6792.2018.0126
Chicago
Nerune, S. M., Khan, M. N., Potekar, R. M., Patil, V.. "Natural versus synthetic fixative in oral cytological smears – A double blind study." Indian J Pathol Oncol 5, no. 4 (2018): 663-666. https://doi.org/10.18231/2394-6792.2018.0126