Introduction
ALHE is an uncommon vascular lesion, characterized by florid proliferation of small to medium sized vascular structures lined by plump epitheloid (histiocytoid)endothelial cells surrounded by mixed inflammatory infiltrate of lymphocytes, eosinophils and mast cells.1, 2 Clinically it presents as intradermal papules to subcutaneous nodules that are solitary to multiple, red to brown in colour usually occurring in young adults.1 Most common sites of predilection is subcutaneous tissues of Head and neck particularily in the preauricular area.3 Other unusual sites reported in literature includes muscles, bone and salivary gland4 Intraoral lesions of ALHE are uncommon, and most important site being lip, followed by tongue and buccal mucosa.5 Its etiology and pathogenesis still remains unclear and correct diagnosis is based on distinct histopathological findings.
Case Report
A 60-year-old female attended Outpatient dental dept with complaints of ulcer in the right lateral border of the tongue for 3 months. Physical examination revealed a whitish, non tender ulcerated mass measuring 2.5 cm in greatest dimension opposite to 2nd and 3rd molar (Figure 1).
Medical history and personal history were not significant pertaining to the ulcerated lesion. No regional lymphnodes were enlarged. Incisional biopsy from the ulcerated mass was taken and sent to our dept for histopathological study. Microsection showed a hyperplastic squamous epithelium with underlying inflammatory stroma showing prominent vascularity (Figure 2 a). These blood vessels were lined by epithelioid like endothelial cells with vesicular nuclei that protruded into the lumina and large vacuolated eosinophilic cytoplasm. A dense cellular infiltrate comprising of lymphocytes and predominantly eosinophils were seen surrounding the vessels (Figure 2 b,c,d). The inflammatory process extended beyond the skeletal muscle tissue. No mitosis or nuclear atypia was seen. Immunohistochemical stain for antibodies against CD31 and CD34 showed intense positive staining for vascular structures (Figure 3 a, b). Based on histopathology and IHC, diagnosis of angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia was signed out.
Discussion
ALHE was first described in the year 1969 by Wells and Whimster.2 In 1983 Enzinger and Weiss described the same lesion as epithelioid haemangioma [EH].6 Other terminologies used to describe the lesion included inflammatory angiomatous nodule, pseudo or atypical pyogenic granuloma and histiocytoid hemangioma.7 Intraoral lesions of ALHE are uncommon with tongue being one of the rarest site of involvement. Extensive search in PubMed data base indicated that, till date 12 cases have been previously reported.3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Regarding pathogenesis of ALHE there is still an ongoing debate as to whether ALHE represents a vascular neoplasm or is a reactive inflammatory condition as a result of trauma induced due to mastication bites.3, 5 The inflammatory cells play an important role in proliferation of endothelial cells. A diagnosis of ALHE was not suspected preoperatively in our case as tongue is one of the rarer sites of involvement and moreover clinically the lesion mimicked that of malignancy. Histopathology played a vital role in clinching our diagnosis. Histologically ALHE is characterized by proliferation of small to medium-sized vascular structures lined by epithelioid like endothelial cells with eosinophilic vacuolated cytoplasm and vesicular indented nuclei that protrude into the lumina forming tomb stone appearance. IHC was positive for CD31 and CD34 in the vascular structures thus confirming the presence of endothelial differentiation in the lesion. Most common differential diagnosis of ALHE is kimura’s disease. Kimura disease is rather a inflammatory process with primary nodal involvement and occurs in younger men, in contrast to ALHE where it’s usually neoplastic (benign vascular tumor) showing soft tissue involvement and occurs in middle-aged women. In ALHE the lesions are mostly dermal and there is prominent vascular proliferation with lobular arrangement however in Kimura’s disease there is minor vascular proliferation, lymphoid hyperplasia and eosinophilic microabcesses.
Conclusion
Angiolymphoid hyperplasia with Eosinophilia is a rare entity and should be considered in differential diagnosis when abnormal proliferation of blood vessels are seen. The most common treating modality includes surgical excision and a care must be taken to ensure complete margins of the surgical specimen so as to minimize the possibility of recurrance that often poses a therapeutic challenge. Review of literatures has depicted a recurrence rate of 44.2% in ALHE.13 Though it’s a benign lesion a prompt diagnosis and close monitoring of the patient is essential for futher intervention and better management of the patient.