Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 9, Issue : 2, Year : 2022
Article Page : 112-115
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpo.2022.028
Abstract
Background: Blood smear is considered as the gold standard test to diagnose Malaria parasite. The newer RDTs (malaria antigen) are reported to be highly sensitive, specific and time saving as compared to other diagnostic modalities. This test is undertaken to compare the efficacy of PfHRP-2 tests, PLDH and manual technique.
Result: A total of 252 cases of malaria as diagnosed by Composite reference techniquewere studied. The sensitivity of TFM, RDTs and PCR is 71.5%, 84.3% and 82.6% respectively and the specificity is 81.9%, 77.2% and 78.2% respectively.
Conclusion: The fact that the PCR & RDTs are costly, cannot assess the response of patients to treatment and inability to assess parasitic stage and density, makes the old dictum “Blood smears are the gold standard for the diagnosis of Malaria” to still hold truth.
Keywords: Rapid diagnostic tests, Parasitaemia, Thick smears, PCR.
How to cite : Mahjabeen S S, Mousa R, Salah R, Baig M A, Swamy K, Comparative analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of malaria parasite by microscopy, RDTs (PfHRP-2 & PLDH) and PCR. Indian J Pathol Oncol 2022;9(2):112-115
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Received : 01-06-2021
Accepted : 25-04-2022
Viewed: 880
PDF Downloaded: 381